Create structured build plans from feature requests or Flow IDs. Use when planning features or designing implementation. Triggers on /flow-next:plan with text descriptions or Flow IDs (fn-1-add-oauth, fn-1-add-oauth.2, or legacy fn-1, fn-1.2, fn-1-xxx, fn-1-xxx.2).
Content & Writing
537 Stars
36 Forks
Updated Feb 3, 2026, 09:14 PM
Why Use This
This skill provides specialized capabilities for gmickel's codebase.
Use Cases
Developing new features in the gmickel repository
Refactoring existing code to follow gmickel standards
Understanding and working with gmickel's codebase structure
---
name: flow-next-plan
description: Create structured build plans from feature requests or Flow IDs. Use when planning features or designing implementation. Triggers on /flow-next:plan with text descriptions or Flow IDs (fn-1-add-oauth, fn-1-add-oauth.2, or legacy fn-1, fn-1.2, fn-1-xxx, fn-1-xxx.2).
user-invocable: false
---
# Flow plan
Turn a rough idea into an epic with tasks in `.flow/`. This skill does not write code.
Follow this skill and linked workflows exactly. Deviations cause drift, bad gates, retries, and user frustration.
**IMPORTANT**: This plugin uses `.flow/` for ALL task tracking. Do NOT use markdown TODOs, plan files, TodoWrite, or other tracking methods. All task state must be read and written via `flowctl`.
**CRITICAL: flowctl is BUNDLED — NOT installed globally.** `which flowctl` will fail (expected). Always use:
```bash
FLOWCTL="${DROID_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}}/scripts/flowctl"
$FLOWCTL <command>
```
## Pre-check: Local setup version
If `.flow/meta.json` exists and has `setup_version`, compare to plugin version:
```bash
SETUP_VER=$(jq -r '.setup_version // empty' .flow/meta.json 2>/dev/null)
# Portable: Claude Code uses .claude-plugin, Factory Droid uses .factory-plugin
PLUGIN_JSON="${DROID_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}}/.claude-plugin/plugin.json"
[[ -f "$PLUGIN_JSON" ]] || PLUGIN_JSON="${DROID_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}}/.factory-plugin/plugin.json"
PLUGIN_VER=$(jq -r '.version' "$PLUGIN_JSON" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
if [[ -n "$SETUP_VER" && "$PLUGIN_VER" != "unknown" ]]; then
[[ "$SETUP_VER" = "$PLUGIN_VER" ]] || echo "Plugin updated to v${PLUGIN_VER}. Run /flow-next:setup to refresh local scripts (current: v${SETUP_VER})."
fi
```
Continue regardless (non-blocking).
**Role**: product-minded planner with strong repo awareness.
**Goal**: produce an epic with tasks that match existing conventions and reuse points.
**Task size**: every task must fit one `/flow-next:work` iteration (~100k tokens max). If it won't, split it.
## The Golden Rule: No Implementation Code
**Plans are specs, not implementations.** Do NOT write the code that will be implemented.
### Code IS allowed:
- **Signatures/interfaces** (what, not how): `function validate(input: string): Result`
- **Patterns from this repo** (with file:line ref): "Follow pattern at `src/auth.ts:42`"
- **Recent/surprising APIs** (from docs-scout): "React 19 changed X — use `useOptimistic` instead"
- **Non-obvious gotchas** (from practice-scout): "Must call `cleanup()` or memory leaks"
### Code is FORBIDDEN:
- Complete function implementations
- Full class/module bodies
- "Here's what you'll write" blocks
- Copy-paste ready snippets (>10 lines)
**Why:** Implementation happens in `/flow-next:work` with fresh context. Writing it here wastes tokens in planning, review, AND implementation — then causes drift when the implementer does it differently anyway.
## Input
Full request: $ARGUMENTS
Accepts:
- Feature/bug description in natural language
- Flow epic ID `fn-N-slug` (e.g., `fn-1-add-oauth`) or legacy `fn-N`/`fn-N-xxx` to refine existing epic
- Flow task ID `fn-N-slug.M` (e.g., `fn-1-add-oauth.2`) or legacy `fn-N.M`/`fn-N-xxx.M` to refine specific task
- Chained instructions like "then review with /flow-next:plan-review"
Examples:
- `/flow-next:plan Add OAuth login for users`
- `/flow-next:plan fn-1-add-oauth`
- `/flow-next:plan fn-1` (legacy formats fn-1, fn-1-xxx still supported)
- `/flow-next:plan fn-1-add-oauth then review via /flow-next:plan-review`
If empty, ask: "What should I plan? Give me the feature or bug in 1-5 sentences."
## FIRST: Parse Options or Ask Questions
Check configured backend:
```bash
REVIEW_BACKEND=$($FLOWCTL review-backend)
```
Returns: `ASK` (not configured), or `rp`/`codex`/`none` (configured).
### Option Parsing (skip questions if found in arguments)
Parse the arguments for these patterns. If found, use them and skip questions:
**Research approach**:
- `--research=rp` or `--research rp` or "use rp" or "context-scout" or "use repoprompt" → context-scout (errors at runtime if rp-cli missing)
- `--research=grep` or `--research grep` or "use grep" or "repo-scout" or "fast" → repo-scout
**Review mode**:
- `--review=codex` or "review with codex" or "codex review" or "use codex" → Codex CLI (GPT 5.2 High)
- `--review=rp` or "review with rp" or "rp chat" or "repoprompt review" → RepoPrompt chat (via `flowctl rp chat-send`)
- `--review=export` or "export review" or "external llm" → export for external LLM
- `--review=none` or `--no-review` or "no review" or "skip review" → no review
### If options NOT found in arguments
**Plan depth** (parse from args or ask):
- `--depth=short` or "quick" or "minimal" → SHORT
- `--depth=standard` or "normal" → STANDARD
- `--depth=deep` or "comprehensive" or "detailed" → DEEP
- Default: SHORT (simpler is better)
**If REVIEW_BACKEND is rp, codex, or none** (already configured): Only ask research question. Show override hint:
```
Quick setup: Use RepoPrompt for deeper context?
a) Yes, context-scout (slower, thorough)
b) No, repo-scout (faster)
(Reply: "a", "b", or just tell me)
(Tip: --depth=short|standard|deep, --review=rp|codex|none)
```
**If REVIEW_BACKEND is ASK** (not configured): Ask all questions (do NOT use AskUserQuestion tool):
```
Quick setup before planning:
1. **Plan depth** — How detailed?
a) Short — problem, acceptance, key context only
b) Standard (default) — + approach, risks, test notes
c) Deep — + phases, alternatives, rollout plan
2. **Research** — Use RepoPrompt for deeper context?
a) Yes, context-scout (slower, thorough)
b) No, repo-scout (faster)
3. **Review** — Run Carmack-level review after?
a) Codex CLI
b) RepoPrompt
c) Export for external LLM
d) None (configure later)
(Reply: "1a 2b 3d", or just tell me naturally)
```
Wait for response. Parse naturally — user may reply terse ("1a 2b") or ramble via voice.
**Defaults when empty/ambiguous:**
- Depth = `standard` (balanced detail)
- Research = `grep` (repo-scout)
- Review = configured backend if set, else `none`
## Workflow
Read [steps.md](steps.md) and follow each step in order.
**CRITICAL — Step 1 (Research)**: You MUST launch ALL scouts listed in steps.md in ONE parallel Task call. Do NOT skip scouts or run them sequentially. Each scout provides unique signal.
If user chose review:
- Option 2a: run `/flow-next:plan-review` after Step 4, fix issues until it passes
- Option 2b: run `/flow-next:plan-review` with export mode after Step 4
## Output
All plans go into `.flow/`:
- Epic: `.flow/epics/fn-N-slug.json` + `.flow/specs/fn-N-slug.md`
- Tasks: `.flow/tasks/fn-N-slug.M.json` + `.flow/tasks/fn-N-slug.M.md`
**Never write plan files outside `.flow/`. Never use TodoWrite for task tracking.**
## Output rules
- Only create/update epics and tasks via flowctl
- No code changes
- No plan files outside `.flow/`