check-plan by aiskillstore
Audit implementation progress against a plan, verify completed work, identify remaining tasks, and validate quality. Use when user asks to check plan status, verify implementation, see what's left to do, or validate plan completion.
Content & Writing
85 Stars
2 Forks
Updated Jan 19, 2026, 04:39 AM
Why Use This
This skill provides specialized capabilities for aiskillstore's codebase.
Use Cases
- Developing new features in the aiskillstore repository
- Refactoring existing code to follow aiskillstore standards
- Understanding and working with aiskillstore's codebase structure
Install Guide
2 steps- 1
Skip this step if Ananke is already installed.
- 2
Skill Snapshot
Auto scan of skill assets. Informational only.
Valid SKILL.md
Checks against SKILL.md specification
Source & Community
Skill Stats
SKILL.md 486 Lines
Total Files 1
Total Size 0 B
License NOASSERTION
--- name: check-plan description: Audit implementation progress against a plan, verify completed work, identify remaining tasks, and validate quality. Use when user asks to check plan status, verify implementation, see what's left to do, or validate plan completion. --- # Check Plan Implementation ## Instructions Perform comprehensive audit of implementation progress against a plan, verify quality of completed work, and generate actionable task list for remaining items. ### Phase 1: Setup & Discovery #### Step 1: Identify the Plan - Ask user which plan to check (or identify from context) - Read the plan file from `.plans/` - Understand all plan items and requirements #### Step 2: Get Git Context (if applicable) ```bash # See what files changed git status # See detailed changes git diff # See commit history on this branch git log --oneline -20 ``` This helps understand scope of changes made. #### Step 3: Identify All Affected Files Create comprehensive list: 1. Files mentioned in the plan 2. Files shown in `git status` 3. Files that might be affected (use Glob/Grep) Create todo list with one item per file to check. ### Phase 2: Systematic File-by-File Audit For EACH file in the todo list: #### Step 1: Read the File - Use Read tool to examine current state - Check memory/context for any previous notes about this file #### Step 2: Map to Plan Items Identify which plan step(s) relate to this file: - Which implementation steps mention this file? - What changes were supposed to be made? - What requirements from the plan apply here? #### Step 3: Verify Implementation Check if planned changes are present: - ✅ **DONE**: Implementation matches plan requirements - ⚠️ **PARTIAL**: Some work done, but incomplete - ❌ **NOT DONE**: No implementation yet - 🔍 **NEEDS REVIEW**: Implementation exists but may not match plan For each file, assess: - Are planned features implemented? - Is code quality good? - Are types used correctly (no `any`)? - Does it follow CLAUDE.md guidelines? - Is it complete or partial? #### Step 4: Quality Verification Check implementation quality: - **Correctness**: Does it work as planned? - **Types**: Proper typing, no `any`, using existing types? - **Naming**: Follows conventions from plan? - **Architecture**: Matches planned design? - **Completeness**: All details from plan step implemented? #### Step 5: Record Assessment Store in memory: ``` File: path/to/file.ts Plan Item: Step X - [description] Status: [DONE|PARTIAL|NOT DONE|NEEDS REVIEW] Notes: [What's good, what's missing, what needs fixing] Quality Issues: [Any problems found] ``` #### Step 6: Update Todo Mark file as checked in the todo list. ### Phase 3: REMOVAL SPEC Verification **CRITICAL**: Verify old code was actually removed. #### Step 1: Read REMOVAL SPEC from Plan Extract all items listed for removal: - Code to be removed (with file/line numbers) - Files to be deleted - Deprecated functions to eliminate #### Step 2: Verify Each Removal For each item in REMOVAL SPEC: 1. **For code to remove**: ```bash # Check if old code still exists grep -n "old_function_name" path/to/file.ts ``` - ✅ If not found: Code successfully removed - ❌ If found: Code still exists (NOT DONE) 2. **For files to delete**: ```bash # Check if file still exists ls path/to/old-file.ts ``` - ✅ If not found: File successfully deleted - ❌ If found: File still exists (NOT DONE) 3. **For deprecated imports/references**: ```bash # Search entire codebase grep -r "old_symbol" src/ ``` - ✅ If not found: All references removed - ❌ If found: References still exist (NOT DONE) #### Step 3: Record Removal Status - List what was supposed to be removed - List what actually was removed - **Flag any items not removed as HIGH PRIORITY tasks** ### Phase 3.5: Original Issue/Task Coverage Verification (MANDATORY) **CRITICAL**: Verify that the implementation covers 100% of the ORIGINAL issue/task requirements, not just the plan steps. #### Step 1: Locate Original Issue/Task Find the source requirement: - GitHub issue that triggered this plan: `gh issue view <number>` - Original task description or ticket - User request that initiated the work #### Step 2: Extract ALL Original Requirements From the original issue/task, extract: - Every functional requirement - Every acceptance criterion - Every edge case mentioned - Every error handling requirement - Any implicit requirements #### Step 3: Map Requirements to Implementation | # | Original Requirement | Plan Step | Implementation Status | |---|---------------------|-----------|----------------------| | 1 | [from issue] | Step X | ✅/❌/⚠️ | | 2 | [from issue] | Step Y | ✅/❌/⚠️ | | 3 | [from issue] | N/A (missing from plan!) | ❌ | #### Step 4: Identify Coverage Gaps **Two types of gaps:** 1. **Plan gaps**: Requirements from issue that weren't captured in plan 2. **Implementation gaps**: Plan steps that weren't fully implemented Both count toward incomplete coverage. #### Step 5: Coverage Assessment ``` Issue Coverage = (Implemented Original Requirements / Total Original Requirements) × 100% ``` **Anything less than 100% = PLAN NOT COMPLETE** ### Phase 4: Gap Analysis #### Step 1: Identify Scope Creep Files changed that are NOT in the plan: - Why were they changed? - Were changes necessary? - Should plan be updated to reflect them? #### Step 2: Identify Missing Work Plan items without corresponding implementation: - Which steps haven't been started? - Which steps are partially complete? - What's blocking completion? #### Step 3: Identify Issue Coverage Gaps (HIGH PRIORITY) Requirements from original issue not in implementation: - Which issue requirements are missing? - Were they missed in planning or implementation? - These are **HIGHER PRIORITY** than plan step completion ### Phase 5: Build Progress Report #### Step 1: Calculate Completion Percentage ``` Total Plan Steps: X Completed Steps: Y Partial Steps: Z Not Started: W Completion: (Y / X) * 100% Weighted Completion: ((Y + 0.5*Z) / X) * 100% ``` #### Step 2: Generate Structured Report Create report at `.plans/[plan-name].progress.md`: ```markdown # Plan Progress Report: [Plan Name] **Date**: [timestamp] **Plan File**: [path] **Status**: [In Progress | Ready for Review | Completed] --- ## Summary - **Overall Completion**: X% - **Steps Complete**: Y / Total - **Steps Partial**: Z - **Steps Not Started**: W - **Critical Issues**: N --- ## Progress by Plan Step ### ✅ Step 1: [Description] **Status**: DONE **Files**: [list] **Notes**: [Any relevant notes] ### ⚠️ Step 2: [Description] **Status**: PARTIAL (60% complete) **Files**: [list] **Completed**: - [What's done] **Remaining**: - [What's not done] **Issues**: [Any problems] ### ❌ Step 3: [Description] **Status**: NOT DONE **Blocking**: [What's blocking this] --- ## REMOVAL SPEC Status ### ✅ Completed Removals - `old_function` from `file.ts` - Successfully removed - `old-file.ts` - Successfully deleted ### ❌ Pending Removals (HIGH PRIORITY) - `legacy_code` from `file.ts:lines 50-100` - **STILL EXISTS** - `deprecated-helper.ts` - **FILE STILL EXISTS** **Critical**: Old code must be removed before plan can be marked complete. --- ## Quality Assessment ### Passed - ✅ TypeScript types used correctly - ✅ CLAUDE.md naming conventions followed - ✅ Architecture matches plan ### Issues Found - ⚠️ `any` type used in `file.ts:42` (should use existing type) - ⚠️ Missing error handling in step 5 implementation --- ## Files Changed ### Planned Changes (from plan) - ✅ `path/to/file1.ts` - DONE - ⚠️ `path/to/file2.ts` - PARTIAL - ❌ `path/to/file3.ts` - NOT DONE ### Unplanned Changes (scope creep) - `path/to/unexpected.ts` - Why: [reason] --- ## Remaining Work ### High Priority 1. **Remove old code** (REMOVAL SPEC items) - [ ] Remove `legacy_code` from `file.ts` - [ ] Delete `deprecated-helper.ts` 2. **Complete Step 3** - [ ] Implement [specific requirement] - [ ] Add proper types ### Medium Priority 3. **Fix quality issues** - [ ] Replace `any` in `file.ts:42` - [ ] Add error handling in step 5 ### Low Priority 4. **Polish** - [ ] [Minor improvements] --- ## Validation Status ### Pre-Validation - [ ] All plan steps completed - [ ] All REMOVAL SPEC items removed - [ ] TypeScript compiles - [ ] Linting passes - [ ] No `any` types added **Ready for Final Validation**: NO (pending items remain) --- ## Next Steps 1. Complete REMOVAL SPEC items (remove old code) 2. Finish Step 3 implementation 3. Fix quality issues 4. Run validation checks 5. Update plan status when 100% complete ``` ### Phase 6: Validation Checks #### Step 1: Run TypeScript Check ```bash # Run type checking npm run typecheck # or tsc --noEmit ``` Record results: - ✅ Passes: Good to go - ❌ Errors: List errors, add to remaining work #### Step 2: Run Linting ```bash # Run linter npm run lint # or eslint . ``` Record results: - ✅ Passes: Good to go - ⚠️ Warnings: List warnings - ❌ Errors: List errors, add to remaining work #### Step 3: Run Build (if applicable) ```bash npm run build ``` Ensure build succeeds. ### Phase 7: Generate Task List Create actionable todo list for remaining work: ```markdown # Remaining Tasks for [Plan Name] ## Critical (Must Do) - [ ] Remove `legacy_code` from `file.ts:50-100` (REMOVAL SPEC) - [ ] Delete `deprecated-helper.ts` (REMOVAL SPEC) - [ ] Complete Step 3: [description] ## Important (Should Do) - [ ] Fix TypeScript error in `file.ts:42` - [ ] Add error handling in step 5 ## Polish (Nice to Have) - [ ] [Minor improvement] ## Validation - [ ] TypeScript passes (`npm run typecheck`) - [ ] Linting passes (`npm run lint`) - [ ] Build succeeds (`npm run build`) - [ ] All REMOVAL SPEC items removed **When all tasks complete**: Update plan file from `.todo.md` to `.done.md` ``` ### Phase 8: Report to User Provide concise summary: ```markdown # Plan Check Complete: [Plan Name] ## Overall Status **X% Complete** (Y of Z steps done) ## Completed ✅ - Step 1: [description] - Step 2: [description] ## In Progress ⚠️ - Step 3: [description] (60% done) ## Not Started ❌ - Step 4: [description] ## Critical Issues 🚨 - **REMOVAL SPEC not complete**: Old code still exists - `legacy_code` in `file.ts` must be removed - `deprecated-helper.ts` must be deleted ## Quality Issues - `any` type used in `file.ts:42` - Missing error handling in step 5 ## Validation - ❌ TypeScript: 3 errors - ✅ Linting: Passed - Build: Not tested ## Next Steps 1. Remove old code (REMOVAL SPEC) 2. Complete Step 3 3. Fix quality issues 4. Run final validation **Detailed Report**: `.plans/[plan-name].progress.md` **Task List**: See remaining work section above ``` ## Critical Principles - **NEVER SKIP FILES** - Check every file in the comprehensive list - **DO NOT EDIT FILES** - This is read-only audit, not implementation - **VERIFY REMOVAL SPEC** - Critical that old code is actually removed - **BE THOROUGH** - Think critically about each file's implementation - **USE MEMORY** - Store context as you review files - **RUN VALIDATION** - Always run typecheck and lint - **BE HONEST** - Mark things as incomplete if they are - **PROVIDE ACTIONS** - Don't just identify issues, provide todo list - **CHECK QUALITY** - Implementation exists doesn't mean it's good - **100% STANDARD** - Plan isn't done until 100% complete and validated ## Completion Criteria A plan can be marked as `.done.md` ONLY when: 1. ✅ **100% of ORIGINAL ISSUE/TASK requirements implemented** (not just plan steps!) 2. ✅ **All plan steps implemented** (100% completion) 3. ✅ **All REMOVAL SPEC items removed** (old code gone) 4. ✅ **TypeScript passes** (`tsc --noEmit` succeeds) 5. ✅ **Linting passes** (no errors) 6. ✅ **Build succeeds** (if applicable) 7. ✅ **No `any` types added** (strict typing maintained) 8. ✅ **CLAUDE.md compliance** (all guidelines followed) 9. ✅ **Quality verified** (implementations match plan specs) **CRITICAL**: Criterion #1 is the MOST IMPORTANT. A plan that completes all its steps but doesn't fulfill the original issue requirements is STILL INCOMPLETE. **Anything less = plan stays as `.todo.md`** ## Supporting Tools - **Grep**: Search for old code to verify removal - **Glob**: Find all relevant files - **Bash**: Run git, typecheck, lint, build - **Read**: Examine file contents - **TodoWrite**: Track file review progress - **Memory/Pinboard**: Store context across files
Name Size